Re: [PATCH v2 11/21] drm/msm/a6xx: Improve MX rail fallback in RPMH vote init

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 11/10/25 5:37 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Current logic assumes that the voltage corners in both MxG and MxA are
> always same. This is not true for recent targets. So, rework the rpmh init
> sequence to probe and calculate the votes with the respective rails, ie,
> GX rails should use MxG as secondary rail and Cx rail should use MxA as
> the secondary rail.

Is GMU always on Mx*A* and never Mx*C*?

Konrad