Re: RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 2025-11-10 20:38, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 07:57:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I really think you are looking at this from a very odd point of
>> view, and you seem to be very inconsistent. Boot time setup? Isn't
>> that what setserial is for? We have the ability to feed this
>> configuration already, but you need a file descriptor.
> 
> I'm not really fond of adding some new open flag that to me seems
> **very** serial / RS-485 specific, and so I'm trying to find some
> way to avoid it.
> 

I don't think it is.  "Opening this device for configuration."

> I also think that that the GPIO style timing requirements of RTS
> **really** should be done as a line discpline, and not in userspace.
> 

No disagreement there -- and so it is. What I want to do is a way to *attach*
that line discipline without poking with the serial port itself.  That's what
I keep trying to get at.

>> Honestly, though, I'm far less interested in what 8250-based hardware does than e.g. USB.
> 
> I'm quite confident that USB won't have "state" that will be preserved
> across a reboot, because the device won't even get powered up until
> the USB device is attached.  And part of the problem was that the
> requirements weren't particularly clear, and given the insistence that
> the "state" be preserved even across reboot, despite the serial port
> autoconfiguration, I had assumed you were posting uing the COM 1/2/3/4
> ports where autoconfiguration isn't stricty speaking necessary.
> 
> In some ways, USB ports might be easier, since it should be possible
> to specify udev rules which get passed to the driver when the USB
> serial device is inserted, and so *that* can easily be done without
> needing a file descriptor.
> 
> And for this sort of thing, it seems perfectly fair to hard code some
> specific behavior using either a boot command line or a udev rule,
> since you seem to be positing that the serial port will be dedicated
> to some kind of weird-shit RS-485 bus device, where any time RTS/DTR
> gets raised, the bus will malfunction in weird and wondrous ways....

But again, it is very much a configuration property.  You don't know where
your dynamically assigned serial port will end up -- and you *can't*, because
it is a property of the DCE -- what is plugged *into* the device.

Now you have someone writing a terminal program or something like Arduino and
decide to enumerate serial ports (which, as I stated, you can't actually do
right now without opening the devices).  This is why it makes sense for the
open() caller to declare intent; this is similar to how O_NDELAY replaced
callout devices.

It would be lovely if we could do something like
open("/dev/ttyS0/option-string") and so on, but that is well and truly a far
bigger change to the whole driver API.

	-hpa