Re: [PATCH 3/4] memcg: remove __mod_lruvec_state

[Roman Gushchin]

Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The __mod_lruvec_state is already safe against irqs, so there is no
> need to have a separate interface (i.e. mod_lruvec_state) which
> wraps calls to it with irq disabling and reenabling. Let's rename
> __mod_lruvec_state to mod_lruvec_state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>