Re: [PATCH] pwm: adp5585: correct mismatched pwm chip info
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Fri Nov 14 2025 - 06:03:36 EST
Hello Nuno,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:46:43AM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-11-14 at 10:30 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:53:08PM +0800, ziniu.wang_1@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The register addresses of ADP5585 and ADP5589 are reversed.
> >
> > My German feeling for the English language suggests:
> > s/reversed/swapped/.
I applied this substitution and dropped the empty line between Fixes:
and the first Signed-off-by: line.
> > I wonder how that didn't pop up during development of 75024f97e82e. I
> > would expect that the driver doesn't work correctly in a very obvious
> > way without this change?! I tend to want to send this to Linus before
> > 6.18, but the question makes me wonder if I'm correct with that
> > urgency. Any insights?
>
> Yeah, this one I kind of asked for Liu to test it (as I was not testing the PWM bits)
> and he did tested it [2]. But it was v2 and that series had some more iterations. So
> I suspect that I messed up along the way and the last version of the series was not
> tested (for the PWM bits).
>
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/3efb68e2-7091-47e1-81a2-39930da5a427@xxxxxxx/
OK, so I guess it is sensible to get it into 6.18. I applied it for
next (i.e.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
) and will send it to Linus mid next week in the assumption that no
issues pop up.
Best regards
Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature