Re: [PATCH] pwm: adp5585: correct mismatched pwm chip info

From: Uwe Kleine-König

Date: Fri Nov 14 2025 - 04:30:47 EST


Hello,

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:53:08PM +0800, ziniu.wang_1@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@xxxxxxx>
>
> The register addresses of ADP5585 and ADP5589 are reversed.

My German feeling for the English language suggests:
s/reversed/swapped/.

> Fixes: 75024f97e82e ("pwm: adp5585: add support for adp5589")
>
> Signed-off-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-adp5585.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-adp5585.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-adp5585.c
> index dc2860979e24..806f8d79b0d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-adp5585.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-adp5585.c
> @@ -190,13 +190,13 @@ static int adp5585_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct adp5585_pwm_chip adp5589_pwm_chip_info = {
> +static const struct adp5585_pwm_chip adp5585_pwm_chip_info = {
> .pwm_cfg = ADP5585_PWM_CFG,
> .pwm_offt_low = ADP5585_PWM_OFFT_LOW,
> .pwm_ont_low = ADP5585_PWM_ONT_LOW,
> };
>
> -static const struct adp5585_pwm_chip adp5585_pwm_chip_info = {
> +static const struct adp5585_pwm_chip adp5589_pwm_chip_info = {
> .pwm_cfg = ADP5589_PWM_CFG,
> .pwm_offt_low = ADP5589_PWM_OFFT_LOW,
> .pwm_ont_low = ADP5589_PWM_ONT_LOW,

I wonder how that didn't pop up during development of 75024f97e82e. I
would expect that the driver doesn't work correctly in a very obvious
way without this change?! I tend to want to send this to Linus before
6.18, but the question makes me wonder if I'm correct with that
urgency. Any insights?

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature