Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] mm: introduce leaf entry type and use to simplify leaf entry logic

[David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)]

On 11.11.25 04:25, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2025, at 17:21, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>
> > The kernel maintains leaf page table entries which contain either:
> >
> > - Nothing ('none' entries)
> > - Present entries (that is stuff the hardware can navigate without fault)
>
> This is not true for:
>
> 1. pXX_protnone(), where _PAGE_PROTNONE flag also means pXX_present() is
> true, but hardware would still trigger a fault.
> 2. pmd_present() where _PAGE_PSE also means a present PMD (see the comment
> in pmd_present()).

I'll note that pte_present/pmd_present etc is always about "soft-present".

For example, if the hardware does not have a hw-managed access bit, 
doing a pte_mkyoung() would also clear the hw-valid/hw-present bit 
because we have to catch any next access done by hardware.

[fun fact: some hardware has an invalid bit instead of a valid/present 
bit :) IIRC s390x falls into that category]

Similar things happen on ordinary PROT_NONE of course (independent of 
pte_protnone).

A better description might be "there is a page/pfn mapped here, but it 
might not be accessible by the CPU right now".

We have device-exclusive/device-private nonswap (before this series) 
entries that fall into the same category, unfortunately ("there is 
something mapped there that is not accessible by the CPU")

--
Cheers

David