Re: [patch V4 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus()

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

On 2025-11-16 15:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Reevaluating num_possible_cpus() over and over does not make sense. That
> becomes a constant after init as cpu_possible_mask is marked ro_after_init.
>
> Cache the value during initialization and provide that for consumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com