Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] userfaultfd: move vma_can_userfault out of line

From: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2025 - 12:02:33 EST

Next message: Bart Van Assche: "Re: [PATCH] block: rate-limit capacity change info log"
Previous message: Conor Dooley: "[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: document the PIC64GX curiosity kit"
In reply to: Mike Rapoport: "[RFC PATCH 1/4] userfaultfd: move vma_can_userfault out of line"
Next in thread: Mike Rapoport: "[RFC PATCH 2/4] userfaultfd, shmem: use a VMA callback to handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 17.11.25 12:46, Mike Rapoport wrote:

From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>

vma_can_userfault() has grown pretty big and it's not called on
performance critical path.

Move it out of line.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers

David

Next message: Bart Van Assche: "Re: [PATCH] block: rate-limit capacity change info log"
Previous message: Conor Dooley: "[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: document the PIC64GX curiosity kit"
In reply to: Mike Rapoport: "[RFC PATCH 1/4] userfaultfd: move vma_can_userfault out of line"
Next in thread: Mike Rapoport: "[RFC PATCH 2/4] userfaultfd, shmem: use a VMA callback to handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]