Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: frequency: adf4377: add clk provider

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Mon Nov 17 2025 - 14:23:02 EST


On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:59:22AM +0000, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> Add support for clock provider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.yaml
> index 5f950ee9aec7..dab1591a36b3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.yaml
> @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ properties:
> items:
> - const: ref_in
>
> + '#clock-cells':
> + const: 0
> +
> + clock-output-names:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> chip-enable-gpios:
> description:
> GPIO that controls the Chip Enable Pin.
> @@ -99,4 +105,18 @@ examples:
> clock-names = "ref_in";
> };
> };
> + - |
> + spi {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + frequency@0 {
> + compatible = "adi,adf4378";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
> + clocks = <&adf4378_ref_in>;
> + clock-names = "ref_in";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-output-names = "adf4378_clk";

Why's the point of having "_clk" in a clock name?
Also, not sure you need a new example for this, could just put them in
the other example, no?

Drop the _clk at least, and then
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
pw-bot: changes-requested

> + };
> + };
> ...
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature