Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2025-09-16 12:47:21 [+0800], pengdonglin wrote:
Hi,

> There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
> been started implicitly by spin_lock().
> 
> Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.

I'm not going argue if this is a good or not but: If you intend to get
this merged I suggest you rebase your series (or what is left since I
think a few patches got merged) on top of current tree and resend them
individually targeting the relevant tree/ list. Otherwise everyone might
think someone else is in charge of this big series.

Sebastian