Re: [PATCH 06/44] bpf: Verifier, remove some unusual uses of min_t() and max_t()

From: Alexei Starovoitov

Date: Fri Nov 21 2025 - 16:40:49 EST


On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 2:42 PM <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> min_t() and max_t() are normally used to change the signedness
> of a positive value to avoid a signed-v-unsigned compare warning.
>
> However they are used here to convert an unsigned 64bit pattern
> to a signed to a 32/64bit signed number.
> To avoid any confusion use plain min()/max() and explicitely cast
> the u64 expression to the correct signed value.
>
> Use a simple max() for the max_pkt_offset calulation and delete the
> comment about why the cast to u32 is safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index ff40e5e65c43..22fa9769fbdb 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -2319,12 +2319,12 @@ static void __update_reg32_bounds(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> struct tnum var32_off = tnum_subreg(reg->var_off);
>
> /* min signed is max(sign bit) | min(other bits) */
> - reg->s32_min_value = max_t(s32, reg->s32_min_value,
> - var32_off.value | (var32_off.mask & S32_MIN));
> + reg->s32_min_value = max(reg->s32_min_value,
> + (s32)(var32_off.value | (var32_off.mask & S32_MIN)));
> /* max signed is min(sign bit) | max(other bits) */
> - reg->s32_max_value = min_t(s32, reg->s32_max_value,
> - var32_off.value | (var32_off.mask & S32_MAX));
> - reg->u32_min_value = max_t(u32, reg->u32_min_value, (u32)var32_off.value);
> + reg->s32_max_value = min(reg->s32_max_value,
> + (s32)(var32_off.value | (var32_off.mask & S32_MAX)));

Nack.
This is plain ugly for no good reason.
Leave the code as-is.

pw-bot: cr