Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: Initialize struct usb_phy list_head

From: Diogo Ivo

Date: Fri Nov 21 2025 - 09:55:47 EST




On 11/21/25 14:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 02:59:06PM +0000, Diogo Ivo wrote:
When executing usb_add_phy() and usb_add_phy_dev() it is possible that
usb_add_extcon() fails (for example with -EPROBE_DEFER), in which case
the usb_phy does not get added to phy_list via
list_add_tail(&x->head, phy_list).

Then, when the driver that tried to add the phy receives the error
propagated from usb_add_extcon() and calls into usb_remove_phy() to
undo the partial registration there will be an unconditional call to
list_del(&x->head) which is notinitialized and leads to a NULL pointer
dereference.

Fix this by initializing x->head before usb_add_extcon() has a chance to
fail.

Fixes: 7d21114dc6a2d53 ("usb: phy: Introduce one extcon device into usb phy")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/phy/phy.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
index e1435bc59662..5a9b9353f343 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
@@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ int usb_add_phy(struct usb_phy *x, enum usb_phy_type type)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
+
usb_charger_init(x);
ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
if (ret)
@@ -696,6 +698,8 @@ int usb_add_phy_dev(struct usb_phy *x)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
+
usb_charger_init(x);
ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
if (ret)


Shouldn't you be also removing an existing call to INIT_LIST_HEAD()
somewhere? This is not "moving" the code, it is adding it.

From my understanding that's exactly the problem, currently there is no
call to INIT_LIST_HEAD() anywhere on these code paths, meaning that if
we do not reach the point of calling list_add_tail() at the end of
usb_add_phy() and usb_phy_add_dev() then x->head will remain uninitialized
and fault when running usb_remove_phy().

Best regards,
Diogo

thanks,

greg k-h