Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] fbdev: q40fb: request memory region
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Nov 21 2025 - 05:03:24 EST
Hi Sukrut,
CC linux-m68k
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 at 19:03, Sukrut Heroorkar <hsukrut3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The q40fb driver uses a fixed physical address but never reserves
> the corresponding I/O region. Reserve the range as suggested in
> Documentation/gpu/todo.rst ("Request memory regions in all fbdev drivers").
>
> If the memory cannot be reserved, fail probe with -EBUSY to avoid
> conflicting with another user of the same address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukrut Heroorkar <hsukrut3@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
> ---
> Testing: This patch is sent as RFT since Q40 hardware is unavilable and
> QEMU does not emulated a Q40 platform. The change is therefore compile-tested
> only.
I would suggest not to apply this, unless it is tested on real
hardware. It wouldn't be the first time an innocent-looking change like
this breaks a system. See e.g.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y5I2oQexHNdlIbsQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/q40fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/q40fb.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,13 @@ static int q40fb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> info->par = NULL;
> info->screen_base = (char *) q40fb_fix.smem_start;
>
> + if (!request_mem_region(q40fb_fix.smem_start, q40fb_fix.smem_len,
> + "q40fb")) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "cannot reserve video memory at 0x%lx\n",
> + q40fb_fix.smem_start);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> if (fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 256, 0) < 0) {
> framebuffer_release(info);
> return -ENOMEM;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds