Re: [usb-storage] Re: [PATCH 28/44] drivers/usb/storage: use min() instead of min_t()
From: Alan Stern
Date: Thu Nov 20 2025 - 09:39:08 EST
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 09:18:02AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:59:42 -0500
> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:41:24PM +0000, david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > min_t(unsigned int, a, b) casts an 'unsigned long' to 'unsigned int'.
> > > Use min(a, b) instead as it promotes any 'unsigned int' to 'unsigned long'
> > > and so cannot discard significant bits.
> > >
> > > In this case the 'unsigned long' value is small enough that the result
> > > is ok.
> > >
> > > Detected by an extra check added to min_t().
> >
> > In fact, min_t(T, a, b) cannot go wrong as long as all the types are
> > unsigned and at least one of a, b has type T or smaller.
>
> That is backwards, both a and b have to have types at least as large
> as T (or rather values that will fit in T).
> - which is exactly what people keep getting wrong.
> Consider:
> u32 a = 4;
> u64 b = 0x100000001ull;
> then:
> min_t(u32, a, b)
> has value 1 not 4.
You are right. For some reason I was thinking that the comparison took
place before the casts, which doesn't make any sense.
Alan Stern