Re: [PATCH v1 03/26] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants

[Chen Ridong]

On 2025/10/28 21:58, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction
> with unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent
> operation of locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the
> functions unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to
> lruvec_unlock{_irq,_irqrestore}.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong