Re: [PATCH 27/44] drivers/tty/vt: use umin() instead of min_t(u16, ...) for row/col limits
From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Thu Nov 20 2025 - 02:23:25 EST
On 19. 11. 25, 23:41, david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
The row/column bounds (for a screen window box) are changed from
'offset one' to 'offset zero' and bound to the screen size using:
v->xs = min_t(u16, v->xs - 1, vc->vc_cols - 1);
This has the side effect of converting zero to the limit.
A check I'm adding to min_t() reports that (u16)(v->xs - 1) (etc)
discards signiticant bits (because v->xs is promoted to 'int' before
the addition).
If v->xs is zero (it comes from userspace) it converts -1 to 0xffff.
This is then bounded to 'vc->vc_cols - 1' which will be fine.
Replace with:
v->xs = umin(v->xs - 1, vc->vc_cols - 1);
which again converts a -1 to unsigned - this time to 0xffffffff,
with the same overall effect.
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Whether zero is meant to mean the 'maximum size' is unknown.
I can't find any documentation for the ioctl and it pre-dates git.
Behavior of zero is unspecified AFAICT (the impl can do whatever is easy :)).
thanks,
--
js
suse labs