Re: [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of addr_port in cls_redirect test

Next message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: ls2kbmc: Fully convert to use managed resources"
Previous message: Petr Mladek: "Re: [PATCH v7 05/13] printk: Add synchronisation for concurrent console state changes"
In reply to: Hoyeon Lee: "Re: [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of addr_port in cls_redirect test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Martin KaFai Lau

Date: Wed Nov 19 2025 - 11:58:37 EST

On 11/18/25 7:09 PM, Hoyeon Lee wrote:

For the “family” field, agreed. ss_family is sufficient, and the tuple
wrapper can be removed. If you're okay with that direction, I can drop
the family field and resend patches 1 and 2 with that cleanup applied.

Please re-spin patch 1 and 2 with the 'struct tuple' cleanup. The patch's title should have "PATCH bpf-next v???". Take a look at other patches posted in the mailing list.