Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: acpi-notify: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
From: Marco Crivellari
Date: Wed Nov 19 2025 - 05:56:38 EST
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:38 AM Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> So after refactoring, WQ_UNBOUND cannot be specified as it has been
> removed AND the default behavior is "unbound", not "per-cpu", right?
> So it should be other way around, e.g.:
>
> The refactoring is going to alter the behavior of alloc_workqueue() to be
> unbound by default.
Yes, it makes sense. I changed that part.
This is the updated version:
This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.
In order to keep alloc_workqueue() behavior identical, explicitly request
WQ_PERCPU.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product