Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] mm: avoid unnecessary use of is_swap_pmd()
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Nov 21 2025 - 14:55:53 EST
On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:25:46 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > To add to the confusion in this terminology we use is_swap_pmd() in an
> > > inconsistent way similar to how is_swap_pte() was being used - sometimes
> > > adopting the convention that pmd_none(), !pmd_present() implies PMD 'swap'
> >
> > !pmd_none()
> >
> > ?
>
> Yeah sorry this is a typo.
>
> Andrew, if it's easy to fix could you?
a few hours ago ;)
> If too late then never mind :)
"too late" is a thing I try to avoid!