Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-elektor: Allow building on SMP kernels

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Sat, 22 Nov 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> > there has since been some fixes/cleanup work to get rid of cli/sti and
> 
> s/has/have/

 An ambiguity here comes from the mixture of plural and uncountable for 
"fixes" vs "... work".

> > rely on spinlocks instead (as pointed out by Wolfram Sang). Tested this
> 
> The sentence just ends after "instead". I think you meant to say "instead,
> let's allow building the driver on SMP kernels again." or something like
> that.

 FWIW I can see nothing wrong with the sentence, "... get rid of cli/sti 
and rely on spinlocks instead." seems like standard English usage to me.

  Maciej