RE: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer memory leak

[Liu, Yongxin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 11:15
> To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxx;
> platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI buffer
> memory leak
> 
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
> 
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:07:30 +0000 Liu, Yongxin wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 10:56
> > > To: Liu, Yongxin <Yongxin.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > andrew@xxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI
> > > buffer memory leak
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:29:53 +0800 yongxin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > Subject: [PATCH net v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix ACPI
> > > > buffer
> > > memory leak
> > >
> > > Presumably typo in the subject? Why would this go via netdev/net.. ?
> >
> > Because the only caller of intel_pmc_ipc() is
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-intel.c.
> > I have sent both to the platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing lists.
> 
> Just to be clear -- the CC is fine, but given the code path - the platform
> maintainer will likely take this via their tree. And the subject
> designation is to indicate which maintainer you're expecting to process
> the patch.

Got it. If needed, I will resend with the correct subject.


Thanks,
Yongxin