Re: [PATCH 0/2] man7/ip.7: Clarify PKTINFO's docs

From: Alejandro Colomar

Date: Tue Nov 25 2025 - 07:13:29 EST


Hi dzwdz,

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 02:50:19AM +0100, dzwdz wrote:
> On 11/18/25 14:51, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Do you suggest moving each socket option to a manual page under
> > man2const/? I think I agree with that. There's precedent, and it makes
> > the pages more readable.
>
> In general - yes, definitely!

Done. I've split ip(7) into a large amount of small pages this weekend.
Please have a look at them and suggest any improvements you consider
appropriate. ;)

> However, struct in_pktinfo can be passed to sendmsg even if IP_PKTINFO isn't
> set, so I don't think it would make sense to document it in e.g.
> IP_PKTINFO(2const) - it should probably get its own manpage in man2type.
> That option, in turn, only makes sense in the context of that struct, so I
> think it should probably be documented in in_pktinfo(2type).
>
> This would /kinda/ be like how e.g. PA_INT(3const) points to
> printf.h(3head), I guess?
>
> I'd be happy to try writing that manpage if you think this approach makes
> sense :)

Yup, it makes sense. :)

I'll simplify your work by doing some initial changes. Please wait
a couple of days before starting, so I can finish doing that.


Have a lovely day!
Alex

>
> Thanks,
> dzwdz




--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature