Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] KVM: S390: Remove PGSTE code from linux/s390 mm
From: Heiko Carstens
Date: Tue Nov 25 2025 - 14:26:37 EST
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:55:52PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Remove the PGSTE config option.
> Remove all code from linux/s390 mm that involves PGSTEs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 -
> arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h | 13 -
> arch/s390/include/asm/page.h | 4 -
> arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 4 -
> arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 121 +----
> arch/s390/kvm/dat.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 24 -
> arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 24 -
> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 829 +-------------------------------
> mm/khugepaged.c | 9 -
> 10 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1015 deletions(-)
...
> pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t *ptep)
> {
> - pgste_t pgste;
> - pte_t old;
> - int nodat;
> - struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> -
> - pgste = ptep_xchg_start(mm, addr, ptep);
> - nodat = !!(pgste_val(pgste) & _PGSTE_GPS_NODAT);
> - old = ptep_flush_lazy(mm, addr, ptep, nodat);
> - if (mm_has_pgste(mm)) {
> - pgste = pgste_update_all(old, pgste, mm);
> - pgste_set(ptep, pgste);
> - }
> - return old;
> + preempt_disable();
> + return ptep_flush_lazy(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, 1);
> }
>
> void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t *ptep, pte_t old_pte, pte_t pte)
> {
> - pgste_t pgste;
> - struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> -
> - if (mm_has_pgste(mm)) {
> - pgste = pgste_get(ptep);
> - pgste_set_key(ptep, pgste, pte, mm);
> - pgste = pgste_set_pte(ptep, pgste, pte);
> - pgste_set_unlock(ptep, pgste);
> - } else {
> - set_pte(ptep, pte);
> - }
> + set_pte(ptep, pte);
> + preempt_enable();
> }
Why did you add the preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair?
This causes preempt_count overflows.
See modify_prot_start_ptes() + modify_prot_commit_ptes()...