Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: ghost swapfile support for zswap

[Johannes Weiner]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:27:04PM +0400, Chris Li wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 11:33 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Do you have a link to that proposal?
> > >
> > > My 2024 LSF swap pony talk already has a mechanism to redirect page
> > > cache swap entries to different physical locations.
> > > That can also work for redirecting swap entries in different swapfiles.
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANeU7QnPsTouKxdK2QO8Opho6dh1qMGTox2e5kFOV8jKoEJwig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > I looked through your slides and the LWN article, but it's very hard
> > for me to find answers to my questions in there.
> 
> Naturally, the slide is only intended to cover what is in the current
> swap table may be phase VII.
> But it does have the physical location pointer consideration.
> 
> > In your proposal, let's say you have a swp_entry_t in the page
> > table. What does it describe, and what are the data structures to get
> > from this key to user data in the following scenarios:
> 
> Please keep in mind that I don't have every detail design laid out. I
> follow the first principles that redirect a swap entry page should
> only take an additional 4 byte per swap entry. VS blow up the swap
> entry size by something like 24 bytes?

Nhat can lay this out in more detail, but there isn't much new stuff
in the virtual swap descriptor. It's mostly just a consolidation of
state we currently track elsewhere - swap count, swapcache pointer,
cgroup ownership etc.

The actual indirection is just a word for the backend type,offset.

That indirection is the tradeoff for swapped pages. In turn you're
getting back all that other stuff for swap slots that *aren't*
currently used. This is a win for the vast majority of users.

Since you mentioned first principles - the dynamically sized swap
space is also much more suitable for compressed pools, which are the
dominant form of swap setups nowadays. Again a win for the majority.

And the worst-case is reasonable. I don't see the giant gulf you seem
to see there. I don't know where it's supposed to be coming from.