Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] idpf: Fix kernel-doc descriptions to avoid warnings

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 07:24:40AM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 7:30 AM
> > On 11/24/25 18:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > >   /**
> > > - * idpf_tx_splitq_has_room - check if enough Tx splitq resources are
> > > available
> > > + * idpf_txq_has_room - check if enough Tx splitq resources are
> > > + available
> > >    * @tx_q: the queue to be checked
> > >    * @descs_needed: number of descriptors required for this packet
> > >    * @bufs_needed: number of Tx buffers required for this packet @@

> > > unsigned int idpf_tx_res_count_required(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq,

> > >    * idpf_tx_splitq_bump_ntu - adjust NTU and generation
> > >    * @txq: the tx ring to wrap
> > >    * @ntu: ring index to bump
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: the next ring index hopping to 0 when wraps around
> > >    */
> > >   static unsigned int idpf_tx_splitq_bump_ntu(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq, u16 ntu)
> Strange idpf_tx_splitq_bump_ntu() is not idpf_txq_has_room 
> Can you doublecheck?

I didn't get. What do you mean? Please elaborate.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko