Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: ghost swapfile support for zswap

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 2025-11-26 at 23:22 +0400, Chris Li wrote:
> 
> That being said, I think I have answered enough technical questions
> of
> my approach, to let you re-consider my proposal. You should be able
> to
> realize by now my approach is more optimal compared to VS. Do you
> agree or not? We are just arguing how big the gap that is.
> 

We would have much more confidence in your
solution if you had told us exactly how
you were planning to solve things in future
stages of the project.

A "I'll solve it, but I can't tell you how"
is not very confidence inspiring.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.