Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] docs: Update documentation to avoid mentioning of kernel.h

[Randy Dunlap]

On 11/26/25 1:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/26/25 1:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/26/25 12:59 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> -The header file include/linux/kernel.h contains a number of macros that
>>>> +There many header files in include/linux/ that contain a number of macros that
>>>
>>>    There are many
>>>
>>>>  you should use, rather than explicitly coding some variant of them yourself.
>>>>  For example, if you need to calculate the length of an array, take advantage
>>>>  of the macro
>>>
>>> Otherwise LGTM. Thanks.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Can you also test it? I hope it will be not so broken (as some of the files
>> seems never were before in the generated docs).
> 
> It's not completely happy:
> 
> linux-next-20251126/Documentation/driver-api/basics:130: ../include/linux/util_macros.h:125: ERROR: Unexpected indentation. [docutils]
> linux-next-20251126/Documentation/driver-api/basics:130: ../include/linux/util_macros.h:123: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string. [docutils]
> linux-next-20251126/Documentation/driver-api/basics:130: ../include/linux/util_macros.h:126: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [docutils]
> linux-next-20251126/Documentation/driver-api/basics:130: ../include/linux/util_macros.h:130: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [docutils]
> 
> 

This little change fixes it for me. Just include it in your patch, please.

---
 include/linux/util_macros.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20251126.orig/include/linux/util_macros.h
+++ linux-next-20251126/include/linux/util_macros.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
  * a fuss about it. This makes the programmer responsible for tagging
  * the functions that can be garbage-collected.
  *
- * With the macro it is possible to write the following:
+ * With the macro it is possible to write the following::
  *
  *     static int foo_suspend(struct device *dev)
  *     {



-- 
~Randy