Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hotplug
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed Nov 26 2025 - 17:32:04 EST
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:12:13AM +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> > index 4f7027f33def..a220a1966cae 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct efi_unaccepted_memory {
> > u32 unit_size;
> > u64 phys_base;
> > u64 size;
> > + bool mem_reserved;
> > unsigned long *bitmap;
> > };
> >
>
> Again, this is ABI break for kexec.
ABI break for kexec? Is that a thing?
Since when do we enforce ABI compatibility for kexec and where are we
documenting that?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette