Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL and HMEM

[dan.j.williams]

Smita Koralahalli wrote:
[..]
> I initially tried picking up the three probe ordering patches from v20/v21
> of Type 2 support, but I hit a NULL pointer dereference in
> devm_cxl_add_memdev() and cycle dependency with all patches so I left
> them out for now.

No, we need to get those baseline patches in, there is no ability to
detect an sync point for "all CXL devices present at boot have had a
chance to probe" without the synchronous registration changes.

I will push a branch with finished patches rather than RFC quality, and
you can build from there. The order of the series should be Sync Probe
changes, DAX HMEM, protocol error series, Type-2.