Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] spi: add multi_lane_mode field to struct spi_transfer
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Dec 02 2025 - 09:48:48 EST
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 08:20:41PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> Add a new multi_lane_mode field to struct spi_transfer to allow
> peripherals that support multiple SPI lanes to be used with a single
> SPI controller.
>
> This requires both the peripheral and the controller to have multiple
> serializers connected to separate data lanes. It could also be used with
> a single controller and multiple peripherals that are functioning as a
> single logical device (similar to parallel memories).
>
> The possible values for this field have the following semantics:
I believe it's too much for a commit message and will be hidden deeply
for the (potential) user. Can we rather create or update the respective
documentation file?
> * @rx_nbits: number of bits used for reading. If 0 the default
> * (SPI_NBITS_SINGLE) is used.
> + * @multi_lane_mode: How to serialize data on multiple lanes. One of the
> + * SPI_MULTI_LANE_MODE_* values.
> * @len: size of rx and tx buffers (in bytes)
> * @speed_hz: Select a speed other than the device default for this
> * transfer. If 0 the default (from @spi_device) is used.
> @@ -1112,6 +1114,10 @@ struct spi_transfer {
> unsigned cs_change:1;
> unsigned tx_nbits:4;
> unsigned rx_nbits:4;
> + unsigned multi_lane_mode: 2;
> +#define SPI_MULTI_LANE_MODE_SINGLE 0 /* only use single lane */
> +#define SPI_MULTI_LANE_MODE_STRIPE 1 /* one data word per lane */
> +#define SPI_MULTI_LANE_MODE_MIRROR 2 /* same word sent on all lanes */
> unsigned timestamped:1;
> bool dtr_mode;
> #define SPI_NBITS_SINGLE 0x01 /* 1-bit transfer */
Seems to me that this also fell apart, as this define sounds like a part of
*x_bits above and your patch makes it even diverse further. Can we keep grouped
members to be in a group?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko