Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: adc: Add ti-ads1018 driver

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:39:34AM -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
> On Mon Dec 1, 2025 at 6:09 PM -05, David Lechner wrote:

...

> I agree, this naming is a bit confusing.
> 
> Andy, are you okay if I revert this back to __ads1018_read_raw()? I can
> add a comment on context.

Only if it doesn't start with __ (double underscore), just find the best suffix
(or prefix?) for it.

TL;DR: I'm against functions without clear semantics to start with __. Usually
this means unlocked in terms of spinlock/mutex/etc. Is it the case here? IIRC
it is not.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko