[PATCH] adfs: Fix incorrect unsigned return type in adfs_f_getnext()

From: Haotian Zhang
Date: Wed Dec 03 2025 - 01:51:52 EST


adfs_f_getnext() stores the return value of __adfs_dir_get() into an
unsigned int. Since __adfs_dir_get() may return negative error codes
such as -ENOENT, these values are converted into large positive numbers.

Change the return variable to type int to correctly preserve and return
negative error codes.

Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/adfs/dir_f.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/adfs/dir_f.c b/fs/adfs/dir_f.c
index 05e963402e25..81dedb796b56 100644
--- a/fs/adfs/dir_f.c
+++ b/fs/adfs/dir_f.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ adfs_f_setpos(struct adfs_dir *dir, unsigned int fpos)
static int
adfs_f_getnext(struct adfs_dir *dir, struct object_info *obj)
{
- unsigned int ret;
+ int ret;

ret = __adfs_dir_get(dir, dir->pos, obj);
if (ret == 0)
--
2.50.1.windows.1