Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: host: renesas_sdhi_core: support configuring an optional sdio mux

From: Rob Herring

Date: Sun Dec 07 2025 - 20:24:57 EST


On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 01:31:11PM +0100, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Some hardware designs route sdio signals through a mux to support
> multiple devices on a single sdio controller.
> In particular SolidRun RZ/G2L/G2LC/V2L System on Module use a mux for
> switching between soldered eMMC and an optional microSD on a carrier
> board, e.g. for development or provisioning.
>
> SDIO is not well suited for runtime switching between different cards,
> however boot-time selection is possible and useful in particular with dt
> overlays.
>
> Add support for an optional sdio mux defined in dt and select it during
> probe.
>
> Similar functionality already exists in other places, e.g. i2c-omap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi.h | 1 +
> drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> index 2c963cb6724b9..c01ab7d81a5af 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> @@ -707,6 +707,7 @@ config MMC_SDHI
> depends on SUPERH || ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
> depends on (RESET_CONTROLLER && REGULATOR) || !OF
> select MMC_TMIO_CORE
> + select MULTIPLEXER
> help
> This provides support for the SDHI SD/SDIO controller found in
> Renesas SuperH, ARM and ARM64 based SoCs
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi.h b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi.h
> index 084964cecf9d8..9508908d8179f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct renesas_sdhi {
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> struct tmio_mmc_host *host;
> struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> + struct mux_state *mux_state;
> };
>
> #define host_to_priv(host) \
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> index f56fa2cd208dd..c58f412ea2028 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mux/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl-state.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/tmio.h>
> @@ -1061,6 +1062,7 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> struct renesas_sdhi_dma *dma_priv;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct tmio_mmc_host *host;
> struct renesas_sdhi *priv;
> int num_irqs, irq, ret, i;
> @@ -1115,9 +1117,25 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> "state_uhs");
> }
>
> + if (of_property_present(node, "mux-states")) {
> + priv->mux_state = devm_mux_state_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

These 2 lines are really just devm_mux_state_get_optional(). Add it if
it doesn't exist.

> + if (IS_ERR(priv->mux_state)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->mux_state);
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "failed to get SDIO mux: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = mux_state_select(priv->mux_state);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to select SDIO mux: %d\n", ret);

Is there a case where mux_state_select() failing is not an error? If
not, mux_state_select() should do the printing.

> + return ret;
> + }
> + }