Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid use of BIT() macro for initialising VMA flags

[David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)]

On 12/5/25 21:15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  5 Dec 2025 17:50:37 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Commit 2b6a3f061f11 ("mm: declare VMA flags by bit") significantly changed
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Andrew - note I've referenced the linux-next commit number above, could you
> > replace with the upstream commit hash once your PR is taken? Thanks!
>
> That's in mm-stable so the hash shouldn't be changing.
>
>
> I'm not really sure what's the best way to determine this.  I use
>
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git tag --contains 2b6a3f061f11
> mm-everything-2025-11-29-19-43
> mm-everything-2025-12-01-19-02
> mm-everything-2025-12-03-23-49
> mm-everything-2025-12-05-00-55
> mm-stable-2025-12-03-21-26

I asked myself the same question a couple of times.

Maybe this?

 $ git branch -r --contains 2b6a3f061f11
  mm/mm-everything
  mm/mm-new
  mm/mm-stable


--
Cheers

David