Re: [PATCH 00/20] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce Kaanapali platform device tree

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/12/2025 12:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> No, there is no rule of Cc-ing phone-devel. No one has to do it and you
>> need to stop coming with the impression that it is sanctioned rule by
>> any platform or architecture maintainer.
> 
> Yes, people need to cc relevant mailing lists, that's why we have the

And it was done here.

> lists, and that's how kernel development works. You want relevant
> developers, well, to review the patch.

They can review the patch because all the necessary lists were Cc-ed here.

> 
> "You should also normally choose at least one mailing list to receive a copy
> of your patch set.  linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should be used by default
> for all patches, but the volume on that list has caused a number of
> developers to tune it out."

And above was fulfilled. Nothing, no single rule says some
"foo-devel-whatever" should be cc-ed. This patchset touches specific
subsystems and concept, and all these were cc-ed.

You really need to stop inventing own rules about undisclosed and hidden
phone-devel (just git grep for phone-devel).


Best regards,
Krzysztof