Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() optimization

From: Viresh Kumar

Date: Sun Nov 30 2025 - 22:42:43 EST


On 28-11-25, 17:13, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> Simplify the error handling branch code in cpufreq_boost_trigger_state().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a4399e5490da..a725747572c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2824,18 +2824,13 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>
> ret = policy_set_boost(policy, state);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_reset_state;
> + break;
> }
>
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_reset_state;
> -
> cpus_read_unlock();
>
> - return 0;
> -
> -err_reset_state:
> - cpus_read_unlock();
> + if (!ret)

Maybe we can make this `if (likely(!ret))`

> + return 0;
>
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
viresh