Re: [PATCH v1 16/31] serial: 8250_mxpcie: optimize Tx using memory-mapped FIFO access
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Sun Nov 30 2025 - 20:53:17 EST
On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 12:44 PM Crescent Hsieh
<crescentcy.hsieh@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add mxpcie8250_tx_chars() to transmit data via memory-mapped FIFO
> access, using the UART-specific Tx FIFO counter and buffer region.
>
> This replaces serial8250_tx_chars() to reduce per-byte I/O operations
> and improve transmit throughput on Moxa PCIe UART devices.
...
> +static void mxpcie8250_tx_chars(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> +{
> + struct uart_port *port = &up->port;
> + struct tty_port *tport = &port->state->port;
> + unsigned int count, i;
> + unsigned char c;
> +
> + if (port->x_char) {
> + uart_xchar_out(port, UART_TX);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (uart_tx_stopped(port) || kfifo_is_empty(&tport->xmit_fifo)) {
> + port->ops->stop_tx(port);
> + return;
> + }
> + count = kfifo_len(&tport->xmit_fifo);
> + count = min(count, port->fifosize - serial_in(up, MOXA_PUART_TX_FIFO_CNT));
Perhaps
unsigned int i, count, txsize;
...
txsize = serial_in(up, MOXA_PUART_TX_FIFO_CNT);
count = min(kfifo_len(...), fifosize - txsize);
?
> + for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
> + if (!uart_fifo_get(port, &c))
> + break;
> + *(port->membase + MOXA_PUART_TX_FIFO_MEM + i) = c;
This is interesting... Why can't the proper IO accessors be used?
> + }
> + if (kfifo_len(&tport->xmit_fifo) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
> + uart_write_wakeup(port);
> +
> + if (kfifo_is_empty(&tport->xmit_fifo) && !(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_RPM))
> + port->ops->stop_tx(port);
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko