Re: [PATCH] x86/elf: Fix core dump truncation on CPUs with no extended xfeatures
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Dec 09 2025 - 04:04:53 EST
* yongxin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <yongxin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Zero can be a valid value of num_records. For example, on Intel Atom x6425RE,
> only x87 and SSE are supported (features 0, 1), and fpu_user_cfg.max_features
> is 3. The for_each_extended_xfeature() loop only iterates feature 2, which is
> not enabled, so num_records = 0. This is valid and should not cause core dump
> failure.
>
> The size check already validates consistency: if num_records = 0, then
> en.n_descsz = 0, so the check passes.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: ba386777a30b ("x86/elf: Add a new FPU buffer layout info to x86 core files")
> Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index 48113c5193aa..b1dd30eb21a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -1984,8 +1984,6 @@ int elf_coredump_extra_notes_write(struct coredump_params *cprm)
> return 1;
>
> num_records = dump_xsave_layout_desc(cprm);
> - if (!num_records)
> - return 1;
The problem with your patch is that '0' is also used for other errors,
it's the all-around error flag for core dump helper functions such as
dump_emit():
if (!dump_emit(cprm, &xc, sizeof(xc)))
return 0;
So please change dump_xsave_layout_desc() to use negatives
as genuine errors and otherwise returns num_records, and
change elf_coredump_extra_notes_write() to only abort
on genuine errors.
Thanks,
Ingo