Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Use 'usb-phy' for node names
From: mr . nuke . me
Date: Tue Dec 09 2025 - 11:28:56 EST
On 12/9/25 10:17 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:07:54AM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
The devicetree spec allows node names of "usb-phy". So be more
specific for the USB PHYs, and name the nodes "usb-phy" instead of
just "phy".
Why? "phy" is more generic.
Hi Dmitry,
The goal is to be more specific. I find usb-phy, ethernet-phy and others
to me much clearer. As I see these more specific names being used throughut
dts files, I did not expect this to be controversial.
I am trying to follow devicetree v0.4, "2.2.2 Generic Names Recommendation",
which allows these more-specific node names.
Alex
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
index 86c9cb9fffc98..4b8cbf1ff131b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ qpic_nand: spi@79b0000 {
status = "disabled";
};
- usb_0_qusbphy: phy@7b000 {
+ usb_0_qusbphy: usb-phy@7b000 {
compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qusb2-phy";
reg = <0x0007b000 0x180>;
#phy-cells = <0>;
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ usb_0_qusbphy: phy@7b000 {
status = "disabled";
};
- usb_0_qmpphy: phy@7d000 {
+ usb_0_qmpphy: usb-phy@7d000 {
compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy";
reg = <0x0007d000 0xa00>;
#phy-cells = <0>;
--
2.45.1
The