Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Use 'usb-phy' for node names

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/12/2025 22:59, mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/9/25 3:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/12/2025 17:26, mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> On 12/9/25 10:17 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:07:54AM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>>>> The devicetree spec allows node names of "usb-phy". So be more
>>>>> specific for the USB PHYs, and name the nodes "usb-phy" instead of
>>>>> just "phy".
>>>>
>>>> Why? "phy" is more generic.
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>> The goal is to be more specific. I find usb-phy, ethernet-phy and others
>>
>> We do not have such goal. Where did you find that goal documented?
> 
> If the goal isn't to be specific, clear, and readable, what is it? Why not be generic, and call subnodes node@, or dev@ ?


Did you read the spec you referred to? What sort of class of devices
represents "node"?


Best regards,
Krzysztof