Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (sht3x) add support for SHT85

[Guenter Roeck]

On 12/10/25 13:44, Antoni Pokusinski wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
> Thanks for the quick review
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 07:09:55PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 12/9/25 13:19, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 12/9/25 09:58, Antoni Pokusinski wrote:
> > > > SHT85 is a temperature and humidity sensor with an interface very
> > > > similar to SHT3x. However, it does not feature alerts (and therefore
> > > > limits).
> > >
> > > The datasheet does suggest that the chip supports both temperature and
> > > humidity tracking alert status, which only makes sense if the chip
> > > supports alert limits. It does not support an alert _pin_, but that
> > > doesn't mean that it does not support limits. I'll want to see definite
> > > confirmation that the chip does not support the limit commands.
> >
> > Looking closer into the SHT85 datasheet, the sensor chip is actually a SHT35.
> > Given that, disabling limit attributes and alarms is neither necessary
> > nor acceptable. It isn't even necessary to add "sht85" to the device ID
> > table; sht3x works just fine. I don't mind if it is added, but it does
> > not need a new chip ID (at least until/unless interrupt support is added
> > to the driver).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> I've just tested the SHT85 sensor with the non-modified sht3x driver and
> the limits and alerts work fine indeed. I was a bit confused by the SHT85
> datasheet which does not explicitly mention the limit commands, that's
> why I excluded them in the patch, sorry for the confusion.
No problem.

> I guess I could simply add {"sht85", sht3x} entry to the i2c_device_id[],
> this would also indicate clearly that sht85 is supported by this driver.

Yes, please do that, and add a note to the documentation and Kconfig.

Thanks,
Guenter