Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:

> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead
> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I
> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste.

This makes sense to me:

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the
series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be
a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature