Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sched_ext: Allow scx_bpf_reenqueue_local() to be called from anywhere

[Tejun Heo]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 02:16:44AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > That doesn't fix the ordering problem in the other direction, but the
> > reordering in the other direction seems inherently less useful at least.
> > Maybe this can also be solved with seq - ie. make enqueue record the current
> > seq, mark the DSQ with the latest reenqueue seq and at enqueue commit time
> > if the captured seq is alreaddy reenqueued, trigger reenqueue.
> 
> How about making it even more explicit renaming the kfunc to something like
> scx_bpf_async_reenqueue_local() (and documenting it)?

I don't know. It's an implementation detail that can change in the future
and we don't want to be adding _async to e.g. scx_bpf_dsq_insert() too.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun