Re: [PATCH net v1 1/3] octeon_ep: disable per ring interrupts

[Simon Horman]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 12:23:00PM +0000, Vimlesh Kumar wrote:
> Disable the MSI-X per ring interrupt for every PF ring when PF
> netdev goes down.
> 
> Fixes: 1f2c2d0cee023 ("octeon_ep: add hardware configuration APIs")
> Signed-off-by: Sathesh Edara <sedara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cn9k_pf.c   | 12 ++++++++++--
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cnxk_pf.c   | 12 ++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cn9k_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cn9k_pf.c
> index b5805969404f..db8ae1734e1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cn9k_pf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_cn9k_pf.c
> @@ -696,14 +696,22 @@ static void octep_enable_interrupts_cn93_pf(struct octep_device *oct)
>  /* Disable all interrupts */
>  static void octep_disable_interrupts_cn93_pf(struct octep_device *oct)
>  {
> -	u64 intr_mask = 0ULL;
> +	u64 reg_val, intr_mask = 0ULL;
>  	int srn, num_rings, i;
>  
>  	srn = CFG_GET_PORTS_PF_SRN(oct->conf);
>  	num_rings = CFG_GET_PORTS_ACTIVE_IO_RINGS(oct->conf);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_rings; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_rings; i++) {
>  		intr_mask |= (0x1ULL << (srn + i));
> +		reg_val = octep_read_csr64(oct, CN93_SDP_R_IN_INT_LEVELS(srn + i));
> +		reg_val &= ~(0x1ULL << 62);
> +		octep_write_csr64(oct, CN93_SDP_R_IN_INT_LEVELS(srn + i), reg_val);
> +
> +		reg_val = octep_read_csr64(oct, CN93_SDP_R_OUT_INT_LEVELS(srn + i));
> +		reg_val &= ~(0x1ULL << 62);
> +		octep_write_csr64(oct, CN93_SDP_R_OUT_INT_LEVELS(srn + i), reg_val);
> +	}
>  

I see that (0x1ULL << 62) is already used in this file.
So I think that as a fix what you have is fine.

But, as a follow-up, it may be nice to name this bit using a #define,
and to define it using BIT_ULL().

Likewise, it may be nice to use BIT_ULL() in place of (0x1Ull << ...) elsewhere.

...