Re: [PATCH 07/11] mm: shmem: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
From: Baolin Wang
Date: Tue Dec 16 2025 - 02:52:20 EST
On 2025/12/16 05:16, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Shmem uses has_transparent_hugepage() to check if PMD-sized pages are
supported, use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() instead.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/shmem.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index b329b5302c48..ad5825667b49 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ static int shmem_parse_huge(const char *str)
else
return -EINVAL;
- if (!has_transparent_hugepage() &&
+ if (!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
+ pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()) &&
huge != SHMEM_HUGE_NEVER && huge != SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -4655,7 +4656,7 @@ static int shmem_parse_one(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
ctx->huge = result.uint_32;
if (ctx->huge != SHMEM_HUGE_NEVER &&
!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
- has_transparent_hugepage()))
+ pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()))
goto unsupported_parameter;
ctx->seen |= SHMEM_SEEN_HUGE;
break;
@@ -5439,7 +5440,7 @@ void __init shmem_init(void)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
- if (has_transparent_hugepage() && shmem_huge > SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
+ if (pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() && shmem_huge > SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
Using pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() here is a bit confusing because the definition of pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() is: it returns true if the CPU supports PMD-sized pages and false otherwise.
However, tmpfs and shmem already support other sizes of large folios, not just PMD-sized large folios.
So, for me, using has_transparent_hugepage() to check would be at least clearer (even though it doesn't change the functionality).