Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: Cleanups around slow_down_io()

[Jürgen Groß]

On 16.12.25 14:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > CPUs anymore. Should it cause any regressions, it's easy to bisect to.
> > > There's been enough changes around all these facilities that the
> > > original timings are probably way off already, so we've just been
> > > cargo-cult porting these to newer kernels essentially.
> >
> > Fine with me.
> >
> > Which path to removal of io_delay would you (and others) prefer?
> >
> > 1. Ripping it out immediately.
>
> I'd just rip it out immediately, and see who complains. :-)

I figured this might be a little bit too evil. :-)

I've just sent V2 defaulting to have no delay, so anyone hit by that
can still fix it by applying the "io_delay" boot parameter.

I'll do the ripping out for kernel 6.21 (or whatever it will be called).


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature