Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] dt-bindings: arm: microchip: move SparX-5 to generic Microchip binding
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Dec 16 2025 - 13:51:02 EST
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 4:58 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 15/12/2025 17:35, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > Now that we have a generic Microchip binding, lets move SparX-5 as well as
> > > there is no reason to have specific binding file for each SoC series.
> > >
> > > The check for AXI node was dropped.
> >
> > Why?
>
> According to Conor, it is pointless [1]
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20251203122313.1287950-2-robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx/#26691879
Right, but you should say why it is being removed in the commit message.
There's probably a bunch of things you could cite for that, but mainly
it's just not something that is done for "simple-bus" devices. The
address they start at just doesn't matter for functionality and the node
itself does nothing without having children of its own (the presence of
which is enforced nowhere).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature