Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: Add header and footer to surround warning reports
From: Waiman Long
Date: Tue Dec 16 2025 - 21:57:54 EST
On 12/16/25 7:31 PM, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:20:45AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
On 12/15/25 2:26 AM, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
Add header and footer to improve log parsing and automated analysis.
This makes lockdep output easier to interpret.
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- asm/bugs.h -> linux/bug.h.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251114062730.1828416-1-tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx/
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 2d4c5bab5af8..adbc44c3808d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
#include <linux/console.h>
#include <linux/kasan.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
@@ -110,6 +111,11 @@ static __init int kernel_lockdep_sysctls_init(void)
late_initcall(kernel_lockdep_sysctls_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
+static void print_footer(void)
+{
+ pr_warn("---[ end trace %016llx ]---\n", 0ULL);
What is the purpose of putting 16 '0' in this "end trace" line? Is it
related to how your parsing script works?
Mostly wanted to align to print_oops_end_marker() in kernel/panic.c. Before
e83a4472bf9f ("panic: remove oops_id"), it was an oops ID. My parsing script
doesn't rely on the 16 '0's but existing parsers might.
I have no strong opinion. Should we just remove the 16 '0's here?
These are warning messages, not panic. So I would prefer not to have
them if they serve no useful purpose and can cause confusion.
Cheers,
Longman