RE: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: samsung: rename gs101_pinctrl_* to exynos9_pinctrl_*

[Alim Akhtar]

Hello Youngmin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 3:06 PM
> To: krzk@xxxxxxxxxx; s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx;
> semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ryu.real@xxxxxxxxxxx; d7271.choe@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> shin.son@xxxxxxxxxxx; jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Youngmin Nam
> <youngmin.nam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: samsung: rename gs101_pinctrl_* to
> exynos9_pinctrl_*
> 
> The suspend/resume helpers named gs101_pinctrl_{suspend,resume} are
> not GS101-specific. They implement the generic save/restore sequence used
> by Exynos9-style controllers that have EINT filter configuration
> (eint_fltcon) to preserve.
> 
> Rename them to exynos9_pinctrl_{suspend,resume} and update all users:
>   - exynos2200, exynos9810, exynos8895, exynos7885, exynos7870,
>     exynosautov9, fsd, and gs101 controller tables
>   - prototypes in pinctrl-exynos.h
>   - definitions in pinctrl-exynos.c
> 
> This aligns naming with the earlier macro/doc cleanups (e.g. using
> EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_* and describing eint_fltcon as Exynos9-specific) and
> makes the helpers clearly reusable by other Exynos9-like SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> (tested on Pixel6/gs101)
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested this series on Exynosautov920 sadk

Tested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>