Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1018: Drop iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() call

From: Jonathan Cameron

Date: Sun Dec 21 2025 - 13:50:06 EST


On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:52:01 -0500
Kurt Borja <kuurtb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Drop iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() call in ads1018_trigger_handler() as
> it's not actually protecting anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@xxxxxxxxx>
I squashed this in. One comment inline.
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
> index af08702b62d2..b34184f68e63 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
> @@ -557,9 +557,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ads1018_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> } scan = {};
> int ret;
>
> - if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev))
> - goto out_notify_done;
> -
> if (iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev)) {
> disable_irq(ads1018->drdy_irq);
> ret = ads1018_spi_read_exclusive(ads1018, &scan.conv, true);
> @@ -568,14 +565,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ads1018_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> ret = spi_read(ads1018->spi, ads1018->rx_buf, sizeof(ads1018->rx_buf));
> scan.conv = ads1018->rx_buf[0];
> }
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_release_buffer;
>
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan), pf->timestamp);
> + if (!ret)
Generally I fairly strongly prefer error paths out of line but in this
case I'd rather just get this merged than go around again so I'll leave
this as it stands.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
> + pf->timestamp);
>
> -out_release_buffer:
> - iio_device_release_buffer_mode(indio_dev);
> -out_notify_done:
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> ---
> base-commit: a7b10f0963c651a6406d958a5f64b9c5594f84da
> change-id: 20251216-ads1018-patch-ad02382e0a04
>